Philaflex 2000 -- Type SEO. When compared
to Neoprene and rubber, Philaflex 2000
insulation provides better: |
|
| · Oil Resistance |
| · Low Temperature Resistance |
| · Heat Aging |
| · Ozone Resistance |
|
| · Chemical Resistance |
| · Abrasion Resistance |
| · Mechanical Strength |
| · Lighter Weight |
|
|
|
LOWER TEMPERATURE FLEXIBILITY
Philaflex 2000 rubber flexible cord jackets resist cracking to
lower temperature than either Neoprene or rubber. The following are results of bend tests: |
GREATER OZONE RESISTANCE
Ozone as generated around most electrical equipment can cause cracking
in most conventional ruibbers. Philaflex 2000 rubber has excellent resistance to cracking caused by ozone. Below are results of
bent loop ozone aging tests of flexible cord jackets. |
|
Philaflex
Type SEO |
Neoprene
Type SO |
Rubber
Type S |
Cold Bend @ -35°C |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Cold Bend @ -50°C |
Pass |
Cracked |
Cracked |
Cold Bend @ -70°C |
Pass |
Cracked |
Cracked |
|
|
Bronco
Type SEO |
Neoprene
Type SO |
Rubber
Type S |
Hours to Cracking |
1,000 |
3000 |
24 |
|
| Philaflex 2000 cables and cords are
rated at 65°C to 105°C. |
NOTE: OZONE EXPOSURE - 100pphm/100°F |
|
SUPERIOR HEAT AGING
Philaflex 2000 rubber
resists cracking and brittleness caused by heat far better than neoprene or rubber.
Comparative heat aging at 250°F is shown. |
TOUGHER ABRASION RESISTANCE
Shown below are comparative grinding wheel type abrasion test resutls on flexible cord
jackets. Again, Philaflex 2000 rubber outperforms neoprene and
rubber flexible cord jackets. |
 |
 |
|
SUPERIOR MECHANICAL STRENGTH
One measure of the mechanical strength of a flexible cord is
resistance to failure under a crushing load. Below are results of crushing strength tests
for flexible cords. |
LIGHTER WEIGHT
Another important consideration in "portable" power
supply cordage is weight. Philaflex 2000 can
offer a lighter, more portable cable than either rubber or Neoprene. Typical weight
savings on 12/3 cords are shown as follow: |
| CRUSHING STRENGTH |
12/3 CORDAGE WEIGHT |
|
Philaflex
Type SEO |
NEOPRENE
Type SO |
RUBBER
Type S |
Pounds Force @ Failure |
3,400 |
2,000 |
3,000 |
|
|
Philaflex
Type SEO |
NEOPRENE
Type SO |
RUBBER
Type S |
| Pounds Per 1000 ft. |
164 |
199 |
235 |
| Weight Reduction |
- |
18% |
33% |
|
|
| COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE CORD JACKET MATERIALS |
UNAGED PHYSICALS
Tensil Strength (PSI)
100% Modulus (PSI)
Elongation (%) |
Bronco
2,000
340
550 |
Neoprene
1,420
690
300 |
Rubber
1,630
770
300 |
LOW TEMPERATURE PROPERTIES
Brittle Point (°F)
Cold Blend @ -35°C
-50°C
-65°C |
-100°C
Pass
Pass
Pass
|
-52°C
Pass
Pass
Pass
|
-38°C
Pass
Fail
Fail
|
AGING PROPERTIES
Air Oven 7 Days @ 121°C
% Retention of Tensile
% Retention of Elongation
Air Oven 7 Days @ 127°C
% Retention of Tensile
% Retention of Elongation
Air Bomb 43 Hrs. @ 127°C
% Retention of Tensile
% Retention of Elongation
|
123
89
150
116
117
116
|
104
17
0
0
56
18
|
188
17
0
0
93
43
|
OZONE RESISTANCE
Hours To Cracking (100pphm/100°F) |
1000 |
24 |
300 |
HEAT DEFORMATION (T2/T1)
2000 gms 121°C |
.76 |
.93 |
.95 |
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
(Crushing Strength) Lbs. Force To Failure
Abrasion Resistance Cycles To Wear Through Jacket |
3,400
36
|
2,000
18
|
3000
14
|
CHEMICAL RESISTANCE
% Diameter Change - 30 Day Immersion at Room Temperature
Alcohol - Ethyl
Ammonia
Gasoline - Unleaded
Kerosene
Oil-Motor 10/40
Oil-Vegetable
Skydol 500
Toldene
Water |
0
1
61
34
9
-2
0
26
-1
|
-1
2
58
25
6
6
-3
60
-2
|
0
1
63
17
0
0
222
56
-1
|
|